Intravenous itraconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropaenia and persistent fever.

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections are a major complication of neutropaenia following chemotherapy. Their early diagnosis is difficult, and empirical antifungal treatment is widely used, and uses of less toxic drugs that reduce breakthrough infection are required. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous itraconazole (ivITCZ) and liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) as empirical antifungal therapy in patients with haematological malignancies with neutropaenia and persistent fever. METHODS: Patients with haematological malignancies who developed fever refractory to broad-spectrum antibacterial agents under neutropaenia conditions were enrolled. Patients were randomised for treatment with LAmB (3.0 mg/kg/d) or ivITCZ (induction: 400 mg/d, maintenance: 200 mg/d). RESULTS: Observed overall favourable response rates of 17/52 (32.7%) and 18/50 (36.0%) in the LAmB and ivITCZ groups, with a model-based estimate of a 4% difference (90% CI, -12% to 20%), did not fulfil the statistical non-inferiority criterion. In the LAmB group, there were two cases of breakthrough infection and five cases of probable invasive fungal disease, whereas in the itraconazole group, neither breakthrough infection nor probable invasive fungal disease occurred. Patients in the ivITCZ group had significantly fewer grade 3-4 hypokalaemia-related events than LAmB group patients (P < .01). The overall incidence of adverse events tended to be lower in the ivITCZ group (P = .07). CONCLUSION: ivITCZ showed similar efficacy and safety as LAmB as empirical antifungal therapy in haematological malignancy patients with febrile neutropaenia, although the small sample size and various limitations prevented demonstration of its non-inferiority.

Bortezomib and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: higher AST and LDH levels associated with a worse prognosis on overall survival.

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib offers a novel approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma producing rapid control. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of bortezomib and dexamethasone-treated patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 44 consecutively-treated multiple myeloma patients with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle or 1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously 1, 8, 15, and 22 of every 35-day cycle) and dexamethasone. RESULTS: The median time to progression, progression free survival time, and overall survival time in the treatment groups was 14.9, 14.9, and 38.3 months, respectively. The present study also suggests the possibility that the prognosis of patients with high levels of AST and LDH might be worse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the treatment of multiple myeloma with bortezomib and dexamethasone is feasible.

[A case of neurotoxicity reduced with pregabalin in R-CHOP chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].

When performing R-CHOP(rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL), neurotoxicity of vincristine(VCR)is the serious dose-limiting factor.Pregabalin is one of the first-line treatments for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in many countries, and we have administered it to relieve the neurotoxicity associated with adverse effects of VCR in a DLBCL patient treated with the R-CHOP regimen.A 49-year-old man with kidney DLBCL had surgery performed.Afterward, the R-CHOP regimen was introduced.In order to relieve the neurotoxicity of VCR, pregabalin was used from day 8 in the second course.The severity of sensory neurotoxicity after the administration of pregabalin was improved from CTCAE(v4.0)grade 3 to grade 1.Therefore, there is a possibility that VCR-induced neurotoxicity is relieved by pregabalin.Further trials are needed to confirm the value of pregabalin.

[Therapeutic choice for the chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase showing late suboptimal response to imatinib].

The response criteria proposed by European Leukemia Net are useful to predict the prognosis of de novo chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in the chronic phase (CP) treated with imatinib. However, the clinical significance of late suboptimal response, which is defined as the achievement of CCgR without MMR after 18 months, is controversial. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical courses of 16 CML-CP patients, who satisfied the criteria for late suboptimal response. The median duration of imatinib treatment was 62 (25∼87) months. The median starting dose of imatinib was 400 mg/day. Imatinib dose was escalated to 600∼800 mg/day in 10 patients for various reasons. Among 4 patients who continued high-dose imatinib for late suboptimal response, 2 patients subsequently achieved MMR, and BCR-ABL mRNA transcript levels were decreasing in 2 patients. However, imatinib was kept at 300 or 400 mg/day in 6 patients. Among these six patients, 4 patients achieved MMR, while 2 failed to achieve MMR. None of 16 patients progressed to the acute phase or blast phase. Imatinib dose escalation was effective for late suboptimal response. Furthermore, a second tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as nilotinib may be more potent to reduce the risk of disease progression by achieving earlier MMR.

Use of imatinib mesylate for favorable control of hypercalcemia mediated by parathyroid hormone-related protein in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia at blast phase.

The case of a 72-year-old woman with chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast phase (BP) with hypercalcemia is reported. Bone x-ray examination revealed multiple osteolytic lesions throughout the body. The serum level of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) was elevated, and PTHrP messenger RNA (mRNA) was detectable in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) at BP but was not detectable at chronic phase (CP).Treatment with conventional chemotherapy did not completely control either serum calcium level or serum PTHrP level. Treatment with imatinib mesylate (imatinib) alone rapidly normalized these parameters in parallel with a decrease in the number of blast cells. The treatment also maintained the patient in good condition for approximately 3 months, even though the number of blast cells, serum calcium level, serum PTHrP level, and PTHrP mRNA level increased at the terminal stage. Mutations of the p53, K-Ras, and BCR-ABL genes in PBMNC at BP were absent. A noteworthy feature in this patient was that PBMNC at BP but not at CP showed high Lyn mRNA expression. Taken together the findings showed that production of PTHrP by blast cells was favorably controlled by imatinib therapy alone. Imatinib may prolong survival time at BP even though the patients have the complication of PTHrP-mediated hypercalcemia.

High incidence of somatic mutations in the AML1/RUNX1 gene in myelodysplastic syndrome and low blast percentage myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia.

A high incidence of somatically acquired point mutations in the AML1/RUNX1 gene has been reported in poorly differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML, M0) and in radiation-associated and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or AML. The vast majority of AML1 mutations identified in these diseases were localized in the amino (N)-terminal region, especially in the DNA-binding Runt homology domain. In this report, we show that AML1 point mutations were found in 26 (23.6%) of 110 patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), RAEB in transformation (RAEBt), and AML following MDS (defined these 3 disease categories as MDS/AML). Among them, 9 (8.2%) mutations occurred in the carboxy (C)-terminal region, which were exclusively found in MDS/AML and were strongly correlated with sporadic MDS/AML. All patients with MDS/AML with an AML1 mutation expressed wild-type AML1 protein and had a significantly worse prognosis than those without AML1 mutations. Most AML1 mutants lost trans-activation potential, regardless of their DNA binding potential. These data suggested that AML1 point mutation is one of the major driving forces of MDS/AML, and these mutations may represent a distinct clinicopathologic-genetic entity.